The Fake Russian

I read the story of how this lunatic, Vitaly Ivolginsky, created his "fanfreak". He wrote about it as if he were preparing for an academic paper, as if it were supposed to be research and not pornography of the mind. It was strange-as if he himself was aware that his actions and words were not just madness, but something deeper than himself. He described the process in detail, from how he came up with the girl he called Delia to how she became the central figure in his creations.

His description of how he created this text sounded like an excuse. He spoke of his feelings as if he were justifying his actions, as if he wanted to convince himself that his path was right. Every word was saturated with desperation, and this was not just a story about how he built his fiction, but something much more painful and passionate.

I couldn't believe it when I saw the references that Vitaly Ivolginsky used to create his "fanfreak", He cited authors like the Strugatsky brothers, Koji Suzuki, and Sergei Pavlov. It was ridiculous. On the surface, there was nothing unusual, but when I read that this psycho used the works of such great and famous writers as templates for his delirium, I felt a strange mixture of laughter and disgust. How could he take their profound works and distort them to such an extent that he could weave into them his twisted thoughts about my wife? It didn't make sense.

It was as if he was trying to justify himself or perhaps imitate these masters to create the appearance of depth in his creation. Vitaly Ivolginsky did not understand that he was not only distorting other people's works, but also his own reality, making it even more absurd and dangerous.

When I realized that the basis of this madness was a film in which my wife played, I felt a cold horror wash over me. This psycho hadn't just written his fantasies, he'd taken a specific scene from real life and turned it into a twisted mirror of his obsession. Everything about her - her role in the film, her image - he'd used as building blocks to construct his delusional, sick world.

This film was, in fact, a launching pad for his mania. Vitaly Ivolginsky saw her as a symbol, as something innocent and angelic, but he could not accept her real side. The scene with her participation in the film became a catalyst for him that exploded his perception. He burned himself in his sick mind, trying to connect her artificial, screen image with the reality that he could not understand and accept.

When I started reading this part of the "fanfreak", I was overwhelmed by a feeling of madness. This psycho, Vitaly Ivolginsky, was not just inspired by the film in which my wife played. He was so deeply immersed in its plot that he tried to rewrite it, changing the details, making them more painful and distorted. In every line, you could see how he distorted reality to fit his fanatical obsession.

He wrote that the scene in which her character strips naked was a moment of revelation for him, and that it gave him "the key to understanding her essence." But then he added elements that weren't in the film: cruel metaphors, symbols, elements of violence that stirred up his warped version of their relationship from within. He explained how her every move, look, and action wove into his perception, how in real life she was not just an actress, but some sacred, inaccessible being.

He even wrote out what changes he made to the plot to "bring it closer" to reality, and what he thought he "left untouched" - like the moments where she remained mysterious and unattainable. He wasn't just doing this for himself. No, he wanted to prove something, find something, something that would allow him to be close to her, at least in this fictional world.

Vitaly Ivolginsky described in detail how he changed the romantic relationship between the main character and her partner, a "fucking faggot," as he called him. He clearly couldn't leave this moment without intervention, because for him this character was a mirror of everything he hated in the real world.

This idealized, attractively glamorous image of a man was so alien to his perception that he deliberately distorts it in his text. In this change of plot lines, he may have been trying to "preserve" his own interpretation of reality, where he and Asia would be ideal, and everyone else would be just a nuisance.

And this young man in the film, the hero, attractive, successful, without moral hesitation, simply existing next to her image, became a projection of someone he could not allow into her life. In the film, this guy was an easy, insignificant character, but in the "fanfreak" he became increasingly toxic, evil. This polished guy, in his opinion, was a person who should not be next to her supreme figure. Through him, Ivolginsky tried to express all his discontent and disappointments - not only in the film, but also in real life.

Thus, the hero of the fanfreak played the role of a provocateur, which in many ways reflected the very concept of how Ivolginsky perceived the world around him.

Vitaly Ivolginsky, with obvious pleasure, described in his "fanfreak" how he took revenge on a character based on the polished guy who was Asia Vieira's boyfriend in the film. In his interpretation, this hero was not only stripped of his dignity, but also subjected to terrible torture: he ended up in prison, where he was forced to tell the story of his fate connected with Asia, and then he died in his cell, suffocated.

This scene was the culmination of the hatred and jealousy Ivolginsky felt while creating this fan fiction. It raised questions of power, punishment and justice, which were obviously at the center of his dark perception of the world. The hero's imprisonment, in which he was tortured and deprived of his life, served as a symbol of what Ivolginsky would do to those he considered traitors or anyone who could eclipse his image of Asia Vieira.